|
It
is thought that the narration at the beginning of Genesis is just an
allegory,
not to be taken literally. But it is a true account, it is
just not talking about what most people think it is talking about.
The first chapters of Genesis are not speaking of the
creation of the Earth and a single man and a single woman.
Genesis 1:2 makes it clear that they are not talking about planet
Earth. In the following pages we will present to you what the
original text is talking about.It
is thought that the narration at the beginning of Genesis is just an
allegory,
not to be taken literally. But it is a true account, it is
just not talking about what most people think it is talking about.
The first chapters of Genesis are not speaking of the
creation of the Earth and a single man and a single woman.
Genesis 1:2 makes it clear that they are not talking about planet
Earth. In the following pages we will present to you what the
original text is talking about.
|
Just
what was this mysterious Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil?
Most of us know that the first parts of Genesis art
not historical, but mythological.
Even liberal Christians tell us that there was no actual tree in the
physical sense, but that the story of Genesis is an allegory about
the development of man and that the tree represents individual free
will.
But can we determine which verses are historical and which
are mythological? If we are just going to go through the Bible
and say this verse is historical and that verse is mythological, we
might as well throw the Bible away and write our own book.
We do have many historical records and ancient documents we can
refer to help us make this important determination, but when it
comes to creation, the Bible is the oldest book and it stands by
itself.
Remember how language has changed over the past 3500 years since
Genesis was first put in print. Through the years, many elements
from Greek and Persian mythology and European Christianity have
crept into the interpretations and translations. In order to
understand the text, we must go to the original Hebrew text and read
it unshackled by any traditions or preconceptions. Luckily most of
this work has already been done for us. The nineteen-century Hebrew
scholar Fabre d’Olivet has already prepared such a translation.
His translation is probably the best available, but, since it is
only a raw text, it does require transliteration and polishing to
make it readable. The following verses are based upon d’Olivet’s
1815 translation:
And in the
lower parts of the adamic, the Eternal produced all the systems of
perception and growth, including . . . .a system of lives and a
system of experiencing desire and aversion. And the Eternal told
humanity, "You may freely partake of every syttem here but you
should not partake of the system of desire and aversion, for when
you do, you will become corrupted. - Genesis 2:9, 16:17
The original Hebrew is quite different from the
traditional and orthodox versions. For comparison, check the above
against your standard King James version of the Bible.
We find that of tree the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil
wasn’t a physical tree at all. These verses speak about system of
human activity which the text calls "a system of experiencing
desire and aversion."
Not only was there no tree, there was no "Garden of Eden"
either. Instead all the activity takes place in the pre-physical
realm which is called the adamic. Nothing else in these verses is
physical either..
Though there was no real, physical tree, but instead a system of
perception, the corrected translation tells us that God warned (but
did not prohibit) Adam of the consequences of participating in this
system.
Of course, Adam partook of the system of desire and aversion anyway
and suffered the consequences.
Both masters, Jesus and Buddha, taught their disciples to
avoid extremes, to take the middle path, to tread the narrow way
between good and evil, desire and aversion. When we walk the narrow
path avoiding both desire and aversion, we are no longer eating of
the fruit of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil".
|
|